The Insiders Report: 09

The Façade of the Lone Gunman

Image by Kris from Pixabay

IN OTHER NEWS: We have received a question from a reader, who asks:
“There is a pattern of high-profile assassinations over the years, that have been attributed to lone gunmen; JFK, RFK, MLK, John Lennon, and more recently the mass shooting in Las Vegas in 2017 and the two assassination attempts on President Trump. In the case of Thomas Crooks, who was killed attempting to shoot President Trump in Butler, Pa., the circumstances are neither credible nor are they investigated by mainstream media. In all of these instances, it has been shown to be most unlikely that they were in fact orchestrated by a single individual. If this is the case, how do the powers that be work in the background to pull-off such events, coordinating multiple people and even groups, while maintaining the façade of the lone gunman?

THE INSIDERS: One interesting thread that ties all these examples that you gave together, is that they are to one degree or another, of a political nature. Now that is plain in the cases of the Kennedys and of Martin Luther King. It is less obvious in the case of John Lennon, although it could be said that he had a powerful influence on society. And as such, that is often deemed to be a challenge to the political status quo. Similarly with the event in Las Vegas, it does not take a great deal of digging to find a political aspect here too. And with the attempts on the life of President Trump, these are clearly attempts on the life of a notable political figure.

This common thread if not political, could be described as linking individuals who seek to, an have, a genuine chance of changing the societal landscape. And this is most definitely deemed to be a threat to those who would seek to control and direct and to shape society, and politics has long been used as a tool in this way.

John Lennon, although not a politician, had the ability to change how society thought, how society related to one another. And in a time where politics was shaped by conflict, sought to bring people together. Not only through his art but philosophically.

So on the larger scale, anything or anyone who threatens the ability of this powerful anti-human faction that we have mentioned in past communications, anyone with the ability to threaten or challenge that power, becomes an immediate enemy to these people. And they are not of the type that accepts a challenge to their authority. They are not of the type that would bat an eyelid, so to speak, at the death of one or even the death of many, to protect their cause.

In fact, these high-profile killings, assassinations, can do much to restore their power, not only by eliminating the threat, but by creating fear and uncertainty within society. And you can see in each of these cases, that was indeed an effect. And that, largely, is one of the main goals of those who would bring about the elimination of their enemies in this way.

It is important to understand that to these people, challengers are not merely political opponents. They are indeed enemies. And to people who do not share any sense of community, indeed any sense of humanity, the public elimination of an enemy brings even greater satisfaction than the private elimination of one. So, conducting these eliminations in public is of great value to those of whom we speak.

The aspect of the lone wolf, the lone gunman as you refer to it, is simply a part of the ploy. A part of creating the most disharmony in society; the most fear. Because when a group or an organisation or an agency of government is found responsible for some heinous crime, there can be calls for action. There can be calls for something to be done about it. But when the perpetrator is a lone individual, be that a crazed madman, or a quiet nobody, then the implication is that nothing can be done. That there is no way of stopping someone like this in a free society, from committing an act of horror.

You asked how these individuals command and coordinate these activities. We would refer you to our last communication, in which we spoke of the security, intelligence and military arms of governments around the world. And the very dark corners within those organisations, and of those who lurk there.

It should be remembered that the modus operandi of these organisations is the clandestine. This is the world in which they operate and are highly proficient. They spend years and even decades cultivating links and contacts with unsavoury elements and with those whom they can manipulate.

They have at their disposal, incredible resources. Derived directly from the treasuries of their
governments, but in the case of many of these organisations around the world, from vast and significant commercial enterprises that they have built up over time, that contribute to the resources at their disposal. It should be remembered that to the everyday member of society, a figure like a billion dollars, is really just a number. It is an inconceivable amount. And yet these organisations have access to resources that number in the countless billions.

And with a combination of the clandestine, skills, contacts manipulation and practically unlimited money, the types of operations that we are talking about are the bread and butter of these organisations. If it is not what they where primarily setup to do, it is something that has become over time a central element of what they do.

And these organisations too are very adept at keeping information siloed, if we may use the jargon. That is, at insuring that any depth of information that an individual may possess, is very limited in its scope. And in insuring that individuals are well aware of the consequences of sharing or disclosing any information that they might possess. Indeed, with many people within these organisations, the threat is unnecessary, because such organisations seek out and attract individuals who take great pleasure from knowing that which others do not and that which cannot be shared, and so are easily manipulable in this way. And those in power who direct such events recognise this ability, most clearly.

There has been much interest, we will say from those outside of the media, in the circumstances of the attempts on President Trump’s life, and in Pennsylvania particularly. This shared many of the hallmarks that we have spoken of, in that there was an overtly political element. It occurred in public. People other than the target were injured and even killed. And those who guide such things would have us believe that this was the work of a lone individual, in this case, a very inexperienced and young man.

This is a case where the virtual vacuum of information around it has contributed to the sense of strangeness and danger. The sense of distrust in authority, and the sense of schism between large elements of society as a whole. And you can see that in this way such events are far more than a simple act of violence. They are far greater in their scope, in the way that they affect both larger society but individuals within that society as well. How people view their world.

There has been speculation around the Butler Pennsylvania event suggesting incredible incompetence on the part of the US Secret Service and other law enforcement organisations. Let it be said that, at the level of planning, the highest levels, there is no incompetence. These people are extremely adept. But they do not hesitate to take advantage of and manipulate the incompetence of others in their roles. And are inclined to do so when the opportunity is there.

What has been seen in organisations such as the Secret Service, in this case, is those in positions of responsibility have had their eyes on values and objectives that have little to do with the core purpose of the organisation, and this makes them, again, very easy targets of manipulation.

Now the logistics of conducting of events such as these public assassinations that we are
discussing, these are extraordinarily complex, to the point where it seems that it would be impossible to tie all the loose ends together. And of course, they do not. In the case of President Kennedy, there are loose ends evident even today, some sixty-odd years after that day. The same is the case with his brother, Robert Kennedy, whose assassination in any real sense still remains unexplained. Although Sirhan Sirhan sits in a prison cell to this day.

And more recently the assassination attempts on President Trump have been largely ignored by media with really no attempt to explain the loose ends. And so those who organise and perpetrate such events are under little pressure to explain away many of the unanswered questions. Particularly when the questions remain unasked.

In conclusion, these public assassinations of political figures and we include the likes of John Lennon in this description for the reasons given earlier, serve to shake the nation, and the world, and individuals, and their trust, and their faith, and their hope in the future. And the very fact that they seem at least on the surface to be the evil work of an individual lurking in the open; someone in a way just like that individual in society who feels the shock and the grief that these events elicit. And this realisation only serves to deepen the effect. And this serves greatly the cause of those who would use these events to their own ends, for the erosion of peoples’ sense of wellbeing and freedom. Their sense of prosperity and safety. Their sense of sharing and community. All of these things are eroded in big and open ways but in small and hidden ways within the individual too. And that is what makes these events so useful and why those who conduct them are willing to undertake the difficulty and the complexity, the expense and the risk, because to them, it is worth it.

And to the society at which this malice is directed, we would say, do not succumb to fear. Do not succumb to distrust. But ask and demand the questions and answers and that loose ends be explained.