The Insiders Report: 12 Part 2

In this report, The Insiders reveal the involvement of shadowy forces in the murder of Charlie Kirk and whether Tyler Robinson is a patsy.

Image by Peter Wiberg from Pixabay

IN OTHER NEWS: Further to our last communication, there has been conjecture around the involvement of intelligence agencies in the murder of Charlie Kirk. What can you tell us about any such involvement?
It appears from certain aspects of this case that the accused, Tyler Robinson, could be a patsy for a wider plot. Is this indeed the case?

THE INSIDERS: We can say that without doubt there has been involvement by elements from within the intelligence community, in this case. And we are not referring here to any involvement in the investigation as such, but rather in its conception and its execution, to use a pointed term in this context.

We are able to say that there is deception afoot. That the circumstances surrounding this individuals death are not entirely as straightforward as would certain elements have you believe. And although there are layers involved here, this was the planned and intentional elimination of someone seen as a threat to the cause, to the “narrative” that these elements work to engender within and across the wider community.

This person was initially considered, if not a worthwhile ally, then someone who could be used in the propagation of the type of political discord that these elements see as being to their advantage. And we would hasten to point out, that Kirk was not a witting participant in any form of this deception.

Agree or disagree with Kirk’s views, they were without doubt, heartfelt and from a principled perspective, at least so far as he was concerned.

You will no doubt be aware that there has been talk about funding from certain quarters, funding of Kirk’s organisation. And of pressure being brought to bear in order to exert influence. And we can say that it is Kirk’s reticence to allow any such influence over his publicly stated position, on certain topics, which has led directly to the shadowy elements reversing their view of Kirk from that of a useful ally to that of a danger to their cause. And this had led directly to his elimination.

Now these shadowy elements, shadowy forces behind the scenes, although outwardly arranged by national governments, operate in a clandestine manner in a way that not only crosses international borders but blurs the lines between national governments in the way that the elements within these organisations operate in concert to their own agenda.

And so we would state categorically that at least on the part of the United States, this assassination was not a matter of government policy, despite the involvement of certain government connected or affiliated participants.

The same cannot be said with such surety when it comes to the involvement of the political elements of other nations in this. You will be aware of the rumours surrounding the offer of a large sum of money to Kirk and his organisation by the Prime Minister of Israel. Let it be known that there is validity to this rumour. And we will allow you to draw your own conclusions in bringing together the elements of what we have said here.

Which brings us to your second question, about Tyler Robinson and whether he is a patsy in all of this. And in a way the answer depends on one’s perspective. Robinson is not an entirely innocent bystander here, there is some degree of involvement. But in terms of a wider plot, his part is or could be considered even minor until it comes to the point of who is to blame and that really is his role in this. And so, from that perspective, it may be said that Robinson is absolutely a patsy in this. In that the intention was always for him to carry the can, as is said. To shoulder the blame for Kirk’s murder in entirety.

And from the perspective that Robinson was certainly not the only individual involved in this event, that others planned and orchestrated and participated in this event, Robinson could be described as a patsy with some validity.

This is not to exonerate Robinson. There was participation on his part. But as we have said, there was much wider participation than solely his.

We will say that the repercussions of this event are not over yet.